United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Blue Apron Holdings Inc

Motion Deadline: 
Monday, October 16, 2017
Summary: 

The lawsuit alleges that Blue Apron violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Registration Statement for the Company's IPO which was launced on June 28, 2017 failed to disclose that: (1) rather than continue to significantly increase spending on advertising, Blue Apron had already decided to significantly reduce spending on advertising in Q2 2017, which would hurt sales and profit margins in future quarters; (2) that Blue Apron was already experiencing adverse on-time in-full rates, meaning orders were not arriving on time or with all the ingredients needed, which was hurting customer retention; and (3) that the Company had run into delays in Q2 2017 with its new factory in Linden, New Jersey.

Subsequent to the IPO, Blue Apron’s stock declined immediately, declining below $5 per share less than two months after the IPO -- a decline of 50% from the IPO price.

On August 23, 2017, Frank Bottini appeared on CNBC to discuss the case. Click here to see the interview: https://finance.yahoo.com/video/meet-attorney-whose-lawsuit-claims-21500...

If you wish to join the litigation or discuss your interests in this lawsuit, contact Frank A. Bottini of Bottini & Bottini at (858) 914-2001 or fab@bottinilaw.com.

Stock Symbol:

Date Filed: 
Thursday, August 17, 2017
Retention Agreement: 

This Retention Agreement governs the retention of Bottini & Bottini, Inc. (the “Attorneys”) by those institutions or individuals (the “Client”) who have authorized the Attorneys to prosecute claims arising out of their purchase of Blue Apron Holdings Inc's stock.
WHEREAS the Client has authorized the Attorneys to prosecute claims relating to the securities of Blue Apron Holdings Inc (the “Litigation”);
WHEREAS the Litigation entails numerous complex factual and legal issues and entails considerable risk;
WHEREAS the Litigation requires the expenditure of substantial resources by the Attorneys retained to prosecute the Litigation;
WHEREAS the Client seeks to maximize their recovery while limiting the expenditure of their own resources; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Client and the Attorneys AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES/CASE HANDLING
A. Upon execution by Client, Attorneys are retained to provide legal services for the purpose of seeking damages and other relief in the Litigation. Client provides authorization to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff in the class action, while the Attorneys will seek to be appointed Class Counsel. If this occurs, the Litigation will be prosecuted as a class action.
B. Attorneys are authorized to prosecute the Litigation. The appointed Lead Plaintiffs will monitor, review and participate with counsel in the prosecution of the Litigation. The Attorneys shall consult with the appointed Lead Plaintiffs concerning all major substantive matters related to the Litigation, including, but not limited to, the complaint, dispositive motions and settlement. Because of potential differences of opinion between Clients concerning, among other things, strategy, goals and objectives of the Litigation, the Attorneys shall consult with the appointed Lead Plaintiffs as to the courses of action to pursue. The Client agrees to abide by the decisions of the appointed Lead Plaintiffs, which shall be final and binding on all Clients.
C. The Attorneys shall provide sufficient resources, including attorney time and capital for payment of costs and expenses, to vigorously prosecute the Litigation.
D. Any recovery will be divided among Clients based on the recognized loss by each Client as calculated by a damage allocation plan which will be prepared by a financial expert, provided to the appointed Lead Plaintiffs, be subject to the Court's approval and will account for such factors as size of stock ownership, date of purchase, date of sale and continued holdings, if any.
II. CONTINGENT FEE AGREEMENT
A. The Attorneys shall advance all expenses in the Litigation. The Client is not liable to pay any of the expenses of the Litigation, whether attorneys' fees or costs. Recovery of costs and other expenses is contingent upon a recovery being obtained. If no recovery is obtained, Client will owe nothing for costs and other expenses. In the event that an order is entered awarding costs and expenses in favor of defendants, Attorneys will be responsible for such costs and expenses, not the Client.
B. If there is a recovery in the Litigation, whether by settlement or judgment, the Attorneys shall be compensated via payment of a reasonable percentage of any recovery as approved by the Court, which amount shall include attorneys’ fees plus reasonable disbursements in the Litigation. “Disbursements” shall include, but not be limited to, costs of travel, telephone, copying, fax transmission, depositions, investigators, messengers, mediation expenses, computer research fees, court fees, expert fees, other consultation fees and paralegal expenses. Any recovery in the Litigation shall first be used to reimburse disbursements.
C. In the event that the Litigation is resolved by settlement under terms involving any “in-kind” payment, such as stock, the contingent fee agreement shall apply to such “in-kind” payment.
III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A. This Agreement may not be assigned by the Attorneys.
B. Client agrees to cooperate in the prosecution of the suit including providing documents to substantiate the Client's claim, and to cooperate in providing discovery information, including a deposition if necessary.
C. Client recognizes that the Attorneys are representing other Blue Apron Holdings Inc investors in the Litigation. The Client agrees that any conflicts caused by such representation are waived.
IV. TERMINATION
A. Client may terminate this Agreement as to any Attorneys, with or without cause and without penalty, by providing the Attorneys with written notice of termination. Attorneys may terminate this agreement with or without cause and without penalty, by providing client with written notice of termination if the Client fails to cooperate in the prosecution of this action or such other reason as may be approved upon application to the Court.
B. If the Attorneys are terminated for any reason, Attorneys shall be entitled (a) to be reimbursed, pursuant to §II above, for reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses that they incurred, but only if and when recovery is obtained, and (b) to be paid such compensation as might be payable to them in accordance with this Agreement, but only if and to the extent and at the time compensation is payable to the Attorneys from any recovery in the Litigation pursuant to §II above.
V. NOTICE
A. All notices to be given by the parties hereto shall be in writing and served by depositing same in the United States Post Office, postage prepaid and registered as follows:
TO THE CLIENT
The address set out in the Authorization to File Blue Apron Holdings Inc Claim form.
TO ATTORNEYS

Bottini & Bottini, Inc.

7817 Ivanhoe Ave., Suite 102

La Jolla, California 92037

Attention: Francis A. Bottini, Jr.

B. Any actions arising out of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of California, and shall be brought and maintained in the San Diego Superior Court, which shall have exclusive jurisdiction thereof.
C. This agreement, along with the signed Certification and Authorization of Named Plaintiff, sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties, and supersedes all other oral or written provisions.

Notice of Opportunity: 

The lawsuit alleges that Blue Apron violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Registration Statement for the Company's IPO which was launced on June 28, 2017 failed to disclose that: (1) rather than continue to significantly increase spending on advertising, Blue Apron had already decided to significantly reduce spending on advertising in Q2 2017, which would hurt sales and profit margins in future quarters; (2) that Blue Apron was already experiencing adverse on-time in-full rates, meaning orders were not arriving on time or with all the ingredients needed, which was hurting customer retention; and (3) that the Company had run into delays in Q2 2017 with its new factory in Linden, New Jersey.
Subsequent to the IPO, Blue Apron’s stock declined immediately, declining below $5 per share less than two months after the IPO -- a decline of 50% from the IPO price.
On August 23, 2017, Frank Bottini appeared on CNBC to discuss the case. Click here to see the interview: https://finance.yahoo.com/video/meet-attorney-whose-lawsuit-claims-21500...
If you wish to join the litigation or discuss your interests in this lawsuit, contact Frank A. Bottini of Bottini & Bottini at (858) 914-2001 or fab@bottinilaw.com.

##place custom text here##

join now

Class Period: 
Press Release: 

IMPORTANT BLUE APRON HOLDINGS INC. INVESTOR ALERT: Bottini & Bottini, Inc. Has Filed a Securities Class Action Lawsuit on Behalf of Blue Apron Investors (NYSE: “APRN”)

San Diego, California, August 17, 2017. Bottini & Bottini, Inc., a law firm specializing in securities class action litigation, announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all persons who purchased the common stock of Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: “APRN”) pursuant to the Registration Statement issued in connection with the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”). The lawsuit—pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York —seeks to recover damages under the federal securities laws for those who purchased Blue Apron stock.

Investors who have incurred losses in are urged to contact the firm immediately at fab@bottinilaw.com or (858) 914-2001. Bottini & Bottini is representing clients on a contingency fee basis. You may obtain additional information concerning the action on our website, www.bottinilaw.com.

If you purchased shares of Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. and would like to assist with the case as a lead plaintiff, you must, no later than October 16, 2017, request that the Court appoint you a lead plaintiff of the proposed class.

The lawsuit charges that Blue Apron violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Registration Statement failed to disclose that: (1) rather than continue to significantly increase spending on advertising, Blue Apron had already decided to significantly reduce spending on advertising in Q2 2017, which would hurt sales and profit margins in future quarters; (2) that Blue Apron was already experiencing adverse on-time in-full rates, meaning orders were not arriving on time or with all the ingredients needed, which was hurting customer retention; and (3) that the Company had run into delays in Q2 2017 with its new factory in Linden, New Jersey.

Subsequent to the IPO, Blue Apron’s stock declined immediately, declining below $5 per share less than two months after the IPO -- a decline of 50% from the IPO price.

If you wish to join the litigation or discuss your interests in this lawsuit, contact Frank A. Bottini of Bottini & Bottini at (858) 914-2001 or fab@bottinilaw.com.

Contact:
Bottini & Bottini, Inc.
Frank A. Bottini, Esq.
Email: fab@bottinilaw.com
Tel: (858) 914-2001
SOURCE: Bottini & Bottini, Inc.

Subscribe to RSS - United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York